Raphael Luta wrote:
>
> burtonator wrote:
>
> > I am going to implement this... I am fairly sure that no one will -1 me
> > :)
> >
> > In order to keep things consistent... and to avoid class naming
> > collisions. I decided that in <psml> we should have
> >
> > <portlet-entry-ref name="BASE_PORTLET"/>
> >
> > instead of the current <portlet-entry ref="BASE_PORTLET"/>
> >
>
> I knew you'd come to see the truth... :)
>
> Actually, I currently think the best construct is something like this:
>
> <view base="portlet_name" href="datasource_name_or_url" />
>
> Where portlet_name is a reference to the portlets as defined in the portlet
> registry and the datasource_url_or_name is a reference to an entry in a
> datasource registry.
I am +0... are there any technical reasons to go this route?
but maybe..
<view base-portlet""/> instead of just base. It does avoid
confusion.... but then we would have:
<portlet-set>
<view/>
........ shouldn't this become view-set?
Kevin
--
** Should SUN Open Source Java? Please Vote:
http://relativity.yi.org/java **
Kevin A Burton (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], UIN: 73488596, ZKey:
burtonator)
http://relativity.yi.org | http://www.openprivacy.org
Message to SUN Microsystems: "Please Open Source Java!"
To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence;
supreme
excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
- Sun Tzu, 300 B.C.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
