At 21:52 2000-11-09, Santiago wrote:


>Roberto Rodr�guez Gal�n wrote:
>
> > Rapha�l Luta wrote:
> >
> > > I propose that the work on Jetspeed is organised in the following
> > > fashion.
> > >
> > > * Improve the current 1.2 CVS code in order to release a
> > >   clean and working software in the near future.
> > >   This involves mostly short term work and will try to preserve
> > >   compatibility with the 1.2 beta(s). Maybe we should release
> > >   a new beta ASAP so that external people can checkout a code
> > >   pretty similar to the one sitting in CVS, this will simplify
> > >   user support.
> > >
> >
>
>+1 on having a new BETA. I'm tired of questions regarding bugs that we fixed
>in june or july.

I'm definitely +1 for a new beta ASAP.

> > This is the most important thing. And it necessary ASAP. Santiago and
> > the rest of people in the spanish group will work hard in this address.
> >
> > > * In parallel to this, start working on a brand new Jetspeed 2
> > >   design along with a generic Portlet API.
> > >
> > > * As soon as the Portlet API is solidified, start a back-port of
> > >   this API to the 1.2 branch, thus creating a new 1.x Portlet API
> > >   implementation.
> >
> > Portlet API is neccesary for all, but it's important to define correctly.

I think Jeff Prickett is right, the precondition for defining the API is to 
have a clear opionion of what the requirements are. We already exchanged 
opinions about this about 2 weeks ago - now we should probably collect this 
and compile it to a reqirement list.

> > >
> > > We have thus a work plan like:
> > >
> > > Short term :
> > > * fix and clean 1.2 branch
> > >   => 1.2 release
> > > * start design of new Portlet API
> > >   => release a Portlet API
> > >

+1

> > > Mid-term (depends on Portlet API work) :
> > > * start Jetspeed 2 design on top of Cocoon 2
> > >   => implement alpha quality implementation
> > > * backport Portlet API to 1.x branch
> > > * identify and componentized shared code between 2.x and 1.x
> > >   branches
> > >   => release of a 1.x Jetspeed Portal implemented on top of
> > >      Turbine
> > >
> > > Long-term :
> > > * release Jetspeed 2 implementation on top of Cocoon 2
> > >

I agree.

> > > I didn't put any date or timeframe on this since it's a voluntary
> > > contributions ( hint... ;) ).
> > >
> > > I plan to work on the clean up and upgrade of the 1.2 branch and
> > > then focus entirely on the Jetspeed 2 implementation.
> > >
> >
> > The most important think: we will work hard (spanish group) to do JetSpeed
> > 1.2 fine. !
> > "Ask not what JetSpeed can do for you--ask what you can do for JetSpeed."
> >
>
>I'm already working on things like:
>
>- making a list of needed features.
>
>- cleaning remaining multithreading issues and creation of transient objects
>like PortletConfig,...
>
>- isolating daemons, so that:
>    - in a simple implementation Jetspeed runs standalone like now
>    - in a "farm" implementation, only one Jetspeed (or a database, CMS,...)
>handles external Resources (channels, etc.) and user PSML or stylesheets. The
>other will use HTTP (maybe webDAV, as we need writable resources) to access
>this information. The current implementation in HEAD uses HTTP PUT to save
>resources, but we should have authentification and better webDAV support and
>maybe a simple filemapper for standalone demo or development setup.
>
>- having a look to performance and some "drawing related" bugs in
>controllers/controls
>
>- solving problems with multi-byte channels. (Example:
>http://www.javable.com/rus/rss.shtml, which currently gets stored in utf-8 in
>the cache, but we loose the russian characters when rendering the portlet. The
>same should happen with japanese or chinese channels, but we don't have any
>yet.) Any help from people that has worked on that issues is welcome. I think
>it is a problem in Xalan or Xerces. It looks a minor problem, but I DO want to
>have a truly global tool for a truly global internet, and I like a lot those
>funny characters that I can't read ;)
>
>- In the same vein, we should have i18n support for screens, error messages,
>etc before we release.
>
>I am having sessions with the team right now, and that and the CVS switch are
>the reasons that I have contributed little in the last days.
>
> >
> > --
> > Roberto Rodriguez - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> > To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives and Other:  <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
> > Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> > To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives and Other:  <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
> > Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>--
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Archives and Other:  <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
>Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ingo.



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other:  <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to