"Kevin A. Burton" wrote:
> > Point 2: Cocoon support
> > In my TODO list for 1.2, I mentioned that the Cocoon
> > support was a hack and was going to fail with Cocoon 1.8.
> >
> > I proposed to remove completely its use from the engine
> > (thus affecting MemoryStore and a few basic functionalities
> > like PortletBrowser, etc...). I think CocoonPortlet should
> > be kept but as a Portlet example, not something we rely on.
> >
> > I'm +1 on this.
>
> I am -0. I certainly see your points. If we make an obvious progression
> towards 2.0 after this then OK. The current Engine is seriously kludged because
> of Cocoon support.
>
> ... anyway. If someone REALLY needs Cocoon for 1.2 speak up now!!!! else we can
> go with removal.
I would strongly like to see a jetspeed 1.2b2 - the very next release - (when will
there a release of jetspeed after 1.2b1 ?) with cocoon support which is compatible
with jetspeed 1.2b1.
>W����i�axP��i��ڽ��i�^��?}��N�.n�+���z�)y�h�X��
+�)�v�,r����칻 �&ލ�l�睡���p��"�h��(�
܆+ޱ��:�^�m���j�-�梚�+��\�o��l��>��鬎��"�h��(
