Johann Bertscheit wrote:
>
> "Kevin A. Burton" wrote:
>
> > > Point 2: Cocoon support
> > > In my TODO list for 1.2, I mentioned that the Cocoon
> > > support was a hack and was going to fail with Cocoon 1.8.
> > >
> > > I proposed to remove completely its use from the engine
> > > (thus affecting MemoryStore and a few basic functionalities
> > > like PortletBrowser, etc...). I think CocoonPortlet should
> > > be kept but as a Portlet example, not something we rely on.
> > >
> > > I'm +1 on this.
> >
> > I am -0. I certainly see your points. If we make an obvious progression
> > towards 2.0 after this then OK. The current Engine is seriously kludged because
> > of Cocoon support.
> >
> > ... anyway. If someone REALLY needs Cocoon for 1.2 speak up now!!!! else we can
> > go with removal.
>
> I would strongly like to see a jetspeed 1.2b2 - the very next release - (when will
> there a release of jetspeed after 1.2b1 ?) with cocoon support which is compatible
> with jetspeed 1.2b1.
>
Do you require the CocoonPortlet for your current implementation for
something that can't be easily done with a simple XSL transform ?
If so, are you willing to take over the maintenance of this Portlet and
fix the Cocoon support to be compatible with Cocoon 1.8 ?
--
Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
