> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 11:43 AM
> To: JetSpeed
> Subject: [1.3a1][vote] packaging options to keep
>
>
> Now that we fully support the WAR format we need to decide
> how many packaging options we are planning to support.
>
> Currently, you can say with have 3 options available :
> - the webapp package
> - the tomcat-build package
> - the src/content and associated files
>
> 3 is too much. Because supporting correctly these 3 packages
> require 3 different installation docs, test process, etc...
>
> * Should we remove the tomcat-build system ?
>
> [ I'm +1. I think that the webapp makes the tomcat-build obsolete ]
+1
>
> * Should we remove the content and assimilated directories in src ?
+1
I think it may already be out of sync.
I dont think anyone has made an effort synchronize and check-in to both
places yet.
>
> [ I'm +0. We could keep these directories for more advanced
> configuration options that those bundled in the webapp at the risk that
> the 2 confs are not kept in synch. ]
>
> * Does anybody have an idea how to package "add-ons" for the webapp ?
> For example, portlets not activated by default, etc...
>
> --
> Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Vivendi Universal Networks - Services Manager / Paris
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
