Oh, this mail didn't make it's way out. So here it's again:
At 20:43 2000-12-15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Now that we fully support the WAR format we need to decide
>how many packaging options we are planning to support.
>
>Currently, you can say with have 3 options available :
>- the webapp package
>- the tomcat-build package
>- the src/content and associated files
>
>3 is too much. Because supporting correctly these 3 packages
>require 3 different installation docs, test process, etc...
>
>* Should we remove the tomcat-build system ?
>
>[ I'm +1. I think that the webapp makes the tomcat-build obsolete ]
+1
>* Should we remove the content and assimilated directories in src ?
>
>[ I'm +0. We could keep these directories for more advanced
> configuration options that those bundled in the webapp at the risk that
> the 2 confs are not kept in synch. ]
+1 They are already out of sync. I think advanced config options should be
in the webapp config files (as comments) or described in seperate files
(but still within the weapp directory).
>* Does anybody have an idea how to package "add-ons" for the webapp ?
> For example, portlets not activated by default, etc...
>
>--
>Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Vivendi Universal Networks - Services Manager / Paris
>
>
>--
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
>Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
