"Thomas F. Boehme" wrote:
>
> With regard to the "iFoo" convention -- well, I have always tried not to use
> global variables (in C++), so
> moving on to Java wasn't a big deal for me. Still objects can have different
> scope in Java (class, instance, temporary, arguments) over years of
> programming I came to have a convention for the different scopes. I don't
> know what kind of Java you are using, Jon, but clashes of scope within the
> same namespace still exist. Some people use "Foo_", some "iFoo", other
> "this.Foo". So what? Until such time there is a Jetspeed/Apache coding
> convention, I'll suggest everybody does what s/he thinks is required to
> write readable and understandable code....
>
There *is* a coding convention for jetspeed, but (un)fortunately variable
names are not part of it.
As far as everything is internally consistent, I don't mind any convention
(provided its consistent with the general Java guidelines).
--
Raphaël Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vivendi Universal Networks - Services Manager / Paris
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>
List Help?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
