Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> on 1/31/01 12:53 AM, "Raphaël Luta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, that is just a paranoid check of mine because when the service was
> > written there was weird behavior with the service initialization order and
> > Rfal was working on the subject so I didn't want to investigate.
> > When we'll upgrade the Turbine dependency, I'll check again all the
> > initialization code based on your modifications.
> >
> > Is the Turbine build stable enough right now to upgrade or should we still
> > wait a few days for the Logging and services change to settle ?
>
> Yea, wait a day or two...there are a couple changes that might go on
> still...
>
OK. Since Jason is rolling out a new TDK, we'll wait for the TDK and update
accordingly.
> > Sam jetspeed build is broken...
>
> Yep...I was actually doing cleanup related to removing dependencies on
> Turbine.java ... :-) In other words...making you guys happy.
>
Thanks :)
Now why did you move the PROPERTIES_PATH_KEY into TurbineServices rather than
TurbineResourceService ?
The latter is the only class which actually uses this constant and it's
definitely resources implementation related.
(there's also TurbineConfig but in a backward compatible constructor which
assumes a specific kind of resources implementation, so it doesn't count)
--
Raphaël Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vivendi Universal Networks - Services Manager / Paris
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>
List Help?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
