on 2/1/01 1:33 AM, "Raphaël Luta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Now why did you move the PROPERTIES_PATH_KEY into TurbineServices rather than
> TurbineResourceService ?
> The latter is the only class which actually uses this constant and it's
> definitely resources implementation related.
> (there's also TurbineConfig but in a backward compatible constructor which
> assumes a specific kind of resources implementation, so it doesn't count)

Send me a patch. :-)

-jon



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>
List Help?:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to