on 2/1/01 1:33 AM, "Raphaël Luta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now why did you move the PROPERTIES_PATH_KEY into TurbineServices rather than
> TurbineResourceService ?
> The latter is the only class which actually uses this constant and it's
> definitely resources implementation related.
> (there's also TurbineConfig but in a backward compatible constructor which
> assumes a specific kind of resources implementation, so it doesn't count)
Send me a patch. :-)
-jon
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>
List Help?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]