Raphaël Luta wrote:
>>
>> In case of portlets that use SAX, I have the name SAXlets (c)
>> Santiago Gala 2000. Look in the archives for the post where I
>> copyrighted the name implicitly last year :) These methods could be
>> put into servlet API, and I think they should. Something like an
>> interface javax.servlet.sax.SAXlet. Servlets implementing this
>> interface can be REQUESTED by the container to use getContentHandler
>> and forbidden to use getWriter/getOutputStream. This again (c)
>> Santiago Gala 2001. Feel free to quote it, since it is under Apache
>> license.
>
>
> Sorry to break your copyright, but this structure has already been
> proposed by Assaf Arkin
> as XMLServlet extension of the servlet API ;-)
> You can find it in Castor.
> That probably means it's a good idea :)
Yep. You are right. The idea, and the implementation, was already there.
Then I can only claim having invented the word SAXlet. A search in
Google only returned the two messages of the list in which it was
mentioned... :)
I still think javax.servlet.sax.SAXlet would be a catching name:)
>
> If you want a good laugh provided by our friends at Xo3:
> http://www.portletsapi.org/
Well, I find in more sad than other thing. Instead of working together
in public, they seem to be trying to close and split the community. So
bad. Why they did not put their ideas and discussions here?
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/jetspeed@list.working-dogs.com/>
List Help?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
