That will released in the next milestone, in a week or so. On Oct 24, 2012 11:45 AM, "ccleve" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks, we're trying to use Jetty 9. > > One difficulty: the jetty-maven-plugin for 9 is not in the maven repo, > which makes debugging hard. > > > > On 10/19/2012 3:53 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: > >> We are releasing jetty9 milestones with the intent of the first stable >> release by the end of the year. So by our estimation you should be >> fine, however if you want to play it safe then jetty8 would be fine. >> >> FWIW, any issues you may find between now and then would have a >> definiate priority in terms of being addressed :) >> >> cheers, >> jesse >> >> -- >> jesse mcconnell >> [email protected] >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:50 PM, ccleve <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm starting to developing an app that will do much asynchronous passing >>> of >>> messages. I'd like to use HttpClient. It seems that Jetty 9 is much >>> improved >>> and would be a better choice than Jetty 8. >>> >>> Here's the rub: the app needs to go into production before the end of the >>> year, and Jetty 9 hasn't been released. >>> >>> Should I use Jetty 9 or Jetty 8? How stable is 9? >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> jetty-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/jetty-users<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users> >>> >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > jetty-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/jetty-users<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users> >
_______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
