Jetty9 source code has been released alongside the artifacts so depending how you are using eclipse you should be fine. I use the maven integration and have no issues, it just downloads the artifact if needs to display some source for it.
regardless, it is the same setup as jetty8 in maven central jesse -- jesse mcconnell [email protected] On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:02 PM, ccleve <[email protected]> wrote: > Decided not to use jetty-maven-plugin. We do need jetty-start, though. > > Also -- with Jetty 9, when there is an exception within the Jetty 9 source > code, clicking on the stack trace in Eclipse yields a "line number not > found" error, and it doesn't find the source. Might have been compiled > without line numbers. > > Going back to Jetty 8 until the next milestone release is out. > > > > On 10/24/2012 11:50 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote: >> >> That will released in the next milestone, in a week or so. >> >> On Oct 24, 2012 11:45 AM, "ccleve" >> <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Thanks, we're trying to use Jetty 9. >> >> One difficulty: the jetty-maven-plugin for 9 is not in the maven >> repo, which makes debugging hard. >> >> >> >> On 10/19/2012 3:53 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: >> >> We are releasing jetty9 milestones with the intent of the first >> stable >> release by the end of the year. So by our estimation you should >> be >> fine, however if you want to play it safe then jetty8 would be >> fine. >> >> FWIW, any issues you may find between now and then would have a >> definiate priority in terms of being addressed :) >> >> cheers, >> jesse >> >> -- >> jesse mcconnell >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:50 PM, ccleve >> <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I'm starting to developing an app that will do much >> asynchronous passing of >> messages. I'd like to use HttpClient. It seems that Jetty 9 >> is much improved >> and would be a better choice than Jetty 8. >> >> Here's the rub: the app needs to go into production before >> the end of the >> year, and Jetty 9 hasn't been released. >> >> Should I use Jetty 9 or Jetty 8? How stable is 9? >> >> _________________________________________________ >> jetty-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users> >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________ >> jetty-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >> >> <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jetty-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > jetty-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users _______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
