Hello Joakim, thanks for your answer; I did not know/check JSR 356 was such a moving target ! Nice to know you'll support it asap ! Anthony
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> wrote: > We have been working on supporting JSR-356 for some time (we started our > efforts with the 006EDR draft back in September 2012). > However, the JSR-356 API/Spec is not stable yet. > The spec itself is still changing, rather dramatically (package renames, > class renames, method refactors, new classes, removal of old classes) as > recently as this week. > > We are trying to keep ahead of it, but its understandably difficult to > nail down support for a moving target ;-) > We expect to have support for JSR-356 shortly after it has been finalized. > > -- > Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> > webtide.com <http://www.webtide.com/> > Developer advice, services and support > from the Jetty & CometD experts > eclipse.org/jetty - cometd.org > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Anthony Dahanne < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> I was quickly reading the documentation at >> http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/configuring-websockets.htmlabout >> WebSockets and Jetty, and was actually wondering what was the level >> of support of JSR 356 in Jetty; does Jetty 9 provide an implémentation of >> this spec ? >> Thanks in advance, >> Anthony >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jetty-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > jetty-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users > >
_______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
