Will do Joakim. If this is a doc bug only, do you have any idea how I can do this today?
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> wrote: > There's no changelog entry for that removal. > It seems like an important feature. Probably has an alternate approach > now. > > Please file a bug about it at: > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Jetty&format=guided > > We are currently on a drive to update our documentation, filing a bug now > about this would be well timed. > > -- > Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> > webtide.com <http://www.webtide.com/> > Developer advice, services and support > from the Jetty & CometD experts > eclipse.org/jetty - cometd.org > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Craig Ching <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for the response Jesse. Here I'm specifically talking about the >> "less efficient" method in the old docs, naming a connector and specifying >> that in jetty-web.xml. setName doesn't appear to be a method on the >> connector anymore, it was available from AbstractConnector in 7.x, but it >> is gone in 9.0. >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Jesse McConnell < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> well, by no means is that feature gone...we likely just need to migrate >>> the docs for it at this point and update the examples >>> >>> open a documentation bug at bugs.eclipse.org under RT/Jetty and we'll >>> get that going >>> >>> thanks, >>> jesse >>> >>> >>> -- >>> jesse mcconnell >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Craig Ching <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Any chance someone could at least comment on this and let me know >>>> definitively that this feature is gone from Jetty 9 (and never to return)? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Craig Ching <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm looking at migrating our configuration from Jetty 7.6.7 to 9.0.0 >>>>> and one thing I can't figure out is something we did that is described >>>>> here: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/How+to+serve+webbapp+A+from+portA+and+webapp+B+from+portB >>>>> >>>>> We would name our connector using something like this: >>>>> >>>>> <New class="o.e.j.server.nio.SelectChannelConnector"> >>>>> <Set name="name">myConnector</Set> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> and then in our web app jetty-web.xml we'd do: >>>>> >>>>> <Configure class="o.e.j.webapp.WebAppContext> >>>>> <Set name="connectorNames" >>>>> <Array type="String"> >>>>> <Item>myConnector</Item> >>>>> </Array> >>>>> </Set> >>>>> </Configure> >>>>> >>>>> Am I going to have to rethink this? I'm sure you probably think I >>>>> *should*, but do I *have* to, is there an equivalent way of doing this in >>>>> 9.0.0? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jetty-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jetty-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jetty-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > jetty-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users > >
_______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
