https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=403360


On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Craig Ching <[email protected]> wrote:

> Will do Joakim.  If this is a doc bug only, do you have any idea how I can
> do this today?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> There's no changelog entry for that removal.
>> It seems like an important feature.  Probably has an alternate approach
>> now.
>>
>> Please file a bug about it at:
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Jetty&format=guided
>>
>> We are currently on a drive to update our documentation, filing a bug now
>> about this would be well timed.
>>
>> --
>> Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]>
>> webtide.com <http://www.webtide.com/>
>> Developer advice, services and support
>> from the Jetty & CometD experts
>> eclipse.org/jetty - cometd.org
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Craig Ching <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the response Jesse.  Here I'm specifically talking about the
>>> "less efficient" method in the old docs, naming a connector and specifying
>>> that in jetty-web.xml.  setName doesn't appear to be a method on the
>>> connector anymore, it was available from AbstractConnector in 7.x, but it
>>> is gone in 9.0.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Jesse McConnell <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> well, by no means is that feature gone...we likely just need to migrate
>>>> the docs for it at this point and update the examples
>>>>
>>>> open a documentation bug at bugs.eclipse.org under RT/Jetty and we'll
>>>> get that going
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> jesse
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> jesse mcconnell
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Craig Ching <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Any chance someone could at least comment on this and let me know
>>>>> definitively that this feature is gone from Jetty 9 (and never to return)?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Craig Ching <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm looking at migrating our configuration from Jetty 7.6.7 to 9.0.0
>>>>>> and one thing I can't figure out is something we did that is described 
>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/How+to+serve+webbapp+A+from+portA+and+webapp+B+from+portB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We would name our connector using something like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <New class="o.e.j.server.nio.SelectChannelConnector">
>>>>>>   <Set name="name">myConnector</Set>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and then in our web app jetty-web.xml we'd do:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Configure class="o.e.j.webapp.WebAppContext>
>>>>>>   <Set name="connectorNames"
>>>>>>     <Array type="String">
>>>>>>       <Item>myConnector</Item>
>>>>>>     </Array>
>>>>>>   </Set>
>>>>>> </Configure>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am I going to have to rethink this?  I'm sure you probably think I
>>>>>> *should*, but do I *have* to, is there an equivalent way of doing this in
>>>>>> 9.0.0?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jetty-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jetty-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jetty-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jetty-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
jetty-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users

Reply via email to