2013/12/5 Jesse McConnell <[email protected]>: > which should be in pretty short order, joakim or I will take a look at > that Weld issue, I was just in that code fairly recently to get 9.0 > supported.
Seems the Weld issue is already being addressed (it's a small change and one I've already done locally, it seems to work OK with my initial tests). Except of course for the longer-standing problem of no injection in Listeners...it would be fantastic if that could be done. > As for moving from larger jee containers to smaller, more lightweight > ones like Jetty...that is a trend we have seen for years now that > appears to be increasing once more. I suppose the current GlassFish situation will drive this even more. For our needs, the perfect application server is one with a highly performant, lean core, simple configuration, and the ability to easily add selected JEE API implementations (CDI, JAX-RS, etc.) as needed. Few apps actually need the whole shebang of JEE, so I'd love to see Jetty progress with this kind of scenario in mind. Thanks for the helpful reply, much appreciated. Best Klaus _______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
