Can you expand on this ... "Except of course for the longer-standing problem of no injection in Listeners...it would be fantastic if that could be done."
Is there a WELD or Jetty bug filed about this? -- Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> webtide.com <http://www.webtide.com/> - intalio.com/jetty Expert advice, services and support from from the Jetty & CometD experts eclipse.org/jetty - cometd.org On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Klaus Brunner <[email protected]>wrote: > 2013/12/5 Jesse McConnell <[email protected]>: > > which should be in pretty short order, joakim or I will take a look at > > that Weld issue, I was just in that code fairly recently to get 9.0 > > supported. > > Seems the Weld issue is already being addressed (it's a small change > and one I've already done locally, it seems to work OK with my initial > tests). Except of course for the longer-standing problem of no > injection in Listeners...it would be fantastic if that could be done. > > > As for moving from larger jee containers to smaller, more lightweight > > ones like Jetty...that is a trend we have seen for years now that > > appears to be increasing once more. > > I suppose the current GlassFish situation will drive this even more. > > For our needs, the perfect application server is one with a highly > performant, lean core, simple configuration, and the ability to easily > add selected JEE API implementations (CDI, JAX-RS, etc.) as needed. > Few apps actually need the whole shebang of JEE, so I'd love to see > Jetty progress with this kind of scenario in mind. > > Thanks for the helpful reply, much appreciated. > > Best > > Klaus > _______________________________________________ > jetty-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >
_______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
