---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John Ashworth <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:30 AM
Subject: [sudan-john-ashworth] Fw: Khartoum threatens to occupy South
Kordofan and Blue Nile
To: Group <[email protected]>


Sudan Threatens to Occupy 2 More Disputed Regions

By JEFFREY GETTLEMAN and JOSH KRON
Published: May 29, 2011
NYT

JUBA, Sudan — The northern Sudanese Army is threatening to seize two
more areas along the combustible north-south border, risking war just
weeks before southern Sudan is due to split off as a new country,
Western and Sudanese officials said Sunday.

The northern government has already defied internationally brokered
agreements with the south, sending its army storming into the
contested border region of Abyei a week ago. Now, its threats strike
again at a peace process, designed to lead the region out of a long
conflict that has cost millions of lives, that seemed closer to
realization after a jubilant and nonviolent vote for independence by
southerners just this January.

According to a letter from the Sudanese military’s high command, the
northern army, in the next few days, plans to take over Blue Nile and
Southern Kordofan States, two disputed areas with a long history of
conflict that are still bristling with arms.

Local leaders and Western diplomats fear that if the northern army
goes through with it, pushing out or forcibly disarming the thousands
of fighters allied to the south in these two areas, it could set off a
much bigger clash between the northern and southern armies.

Malik Agar, Blue Nile’s governor, said Sunday night that northern
forces had recently moved “dangerously close” to the bases of
southern-allied fighters and that he did not think the southern-allied
forces would surrender.

“It’s like putting a cat in a corner,” Mr. Agar said. “They will fight.”

Sudan’s border area is a dizzyingly complex mosaic of ethnic groups
and political loyalties. It is also home to the bulk of the country’s
crude oil and some of the most fertile land in the country, making the
question of how exactly to draw a line across Sudan one of the most
explosive issues the nation confronts as it prepares to split in two.

Under peace agreements signed several years ago, joint forces were
supposed to patrol some of these disputed areas. The two sides had
agreed that Abyei would hold a referendum to decide if it were to join
the north or south, a compromise that was essentially blotted out on
May 21 when thousands of northern Sudanese soldiers marched into
Abyei. Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile were supposed to conduct a less
formal, vaguely defined “popular consultation” process that
southerners say has not been completed.

Southern Sudan is just weeks away from attaining independence, a goal
that has taken more than 50 years. The region, one of the poorest and
least developed places on earth, where four out of five adults cannot
read, defied expectations with its orderly independence referendum in
January.

In the past week, southern leaders have absorbed the loss of Abyei,
complaining bitterly about it but deciding not to respond with
military force, saying that could jeopardize all that they had
sacrificed for.

On Sunday, southern leaders indicated that they would not fight over
Blue Nile or Southern Kordofan either.

“It is not our priority now to get involved in a war,” said Barnaba
Marial Benjamin, the information minister for the government of
southern Sudan. He also said high-level negotiations were about to
begin in Khartoum, Sudan’s capital, over several of these border
issues.

But what may be more dangerous this time is that there are many more
southern-allied fighters stationed in Blue Nile and Southern Kordofan
than there were in Abyei — possibly tens of thousands, compared with a
few hundred in Abyei who quickly retreated last weekend when faced
with a clearly superior northern Sudanese force.

“The move into the Nuba in particular will be explosive,” said Eric
Reeves, a professor at Smith College and one of the leading academic
voices on Sudan. “The amount of weaponry and men under arms is
tremendous.”

Nuba is a mountainous region of Southern Kordofan that is technically
part of northern Sudan but became one of the strongholds of the
southern rebels during the civil war in the 1980s and 1990s.

The southern-allied fighters there are in a more desperate situation
than southern troops were in Abyei. There is no easy way to flee to
the south even if they wanted to. And if the fighters in these areas
give up their weapons, they will be at the mercy of the northern
Sudanese forces whom they have fought for years.

“If it were only so simple for them to move south,” Mr. Agar said.
“But they are not southerners. They are from Blue Nile and they don’t
have any other place to go.”

In an example of the complexities of this area, Mr. Agar is from a
predominantly northern Sudanese ethnic group, Ingesena, and his state,
Blue Nile, is clearly part of northern Sudan, according to an internal
boundary established before Sudan became independent on Jan. 1, 1956.
But Mr. Agar is part of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement, the
organization that led the fight for southern independence. He, along
with countless others from his area, personally battled as guerrilla
fighters for the south against the north.

Mr. Agar said that he had recently received a written order for the
southern forces in his area to disarm.

According to a letter provided to The New York Times, dated May 23 and
marked “Top Secret,” the northern Sudanese army will “redeploy its
forces to all areas north of the 1/1/1956 borders starting from 1 June
2011.” The letter is from Ismat Abdul Rahman Zain al-Abideen, the
chief of staff for the Sudanese military. Western officials have said
the northern military has threatened to attack any southern-allied
soldiers north of the border who do not withdraw immediately.

Northern leaders have not been shy about their intentions to
unilaterally annex large areas of contested territory. They have
amassed an enormous force of troops, tanks and artillery pieces in the
borderlands area and have publicly vowed to take control of all the
disputed territory north of the 1956 border, regardless that the
status of some of those areas was supposed to be decided by the people
themselves.

Rabie A. Atti, a government spokesman in Khartoum, the northern
capital, said Sunday that like Abyei, “Blue Nile and Nuba Mountains in
Southern Kordofan are part of the north, and nothing else.”

Some observers believe that the north’s maneuvering, including the
letter, may be in response to the mounting pressures on Sudan’s
president, Omar Hassan al-Bashir. Many northerners are upset and
fearful about losing the south, especially its oil, and as southern
independence draws near, the northern economy and national currency
have slid. By grabbing what little disputed territory remains, Mr.
Bashir can make himself look strong even though he is still boxed in,
having been indicted by the International Criminal Court in connection
to the massacres in the western region of Darfur.

“This is one way of pushing the envelope to say, ‘Forget you, southern
Sudan, we’re going to make all the negotiations over the border
final,’ ” said one American official who works closely on Sudan.

“I seriously doubt the south will go to war over this. It’s not worth
it to them,” added the official, who was not allowed to speak publicly
on the matter. “But this could lead to internal turmoil. I mean, how
long is the south going to take this humiliation? How long are they
going to back off?”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/30/world/africa/30sudan.html?_r=1&src=twrhp&pagewanted=all

END
______________________
John Ashworth

Sudan Advisor
Sudan Ecumenical Forum

[email protected]

+254 725 926 297 (Kenya mobile)
+249 919 695 362 (Sudan mobile)
+27 82 853 3556 (South Africa mobile)
+44 750 304 1790 (UK/international)
+88 216 4334 0735 (Thuraya satphone)

PO Box 52002 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya

This is a personal e-mail address and the contents do not necessarily
reflect the views of any organisation

--
The content of this message does not necessarily reflect John
Ashworth's views. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, John Ashworth is
not the author of the content and the source is always cited.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "sudan-john-ashworth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.za/group/sudan-john-ashworth

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD 
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.

Reply via email to