I've never seen the problem, but you may be right. How can you verify it?
Modifying that file will only affect the storage graph, nothing else. Javier kryglik wrote: > Hello list :) > i've discovered a little problem with storage graphs. It seems they > count using division of 1000 -- so the results are strange :-) > Running on linux systems. > > Anybody with the same problem? > > I found solution by adding "-b 1024" in graphs/storage.inc.php > $opts_header on the end of file. But I am not sure whether it doesn't > destroy something else in a jffnms-engine :) > > Any suggestions/ideas? thanks. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > jffnms-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Javier Szyszlican, Project Leader, JFFNMS [EMAIL PROTECTED] I hope JFFNMS or I were helpful to you, if you can, please donate at http://jffnms.org/donate ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
