Re: [jffnms-users] graph storage problem (probably)

[kryglik]

Hello Javier  data stored in .rrd seems to be OK, only the graph function doesn't work well. You can verify it on some disk check  [used storage].  I can see the difference on 29G disk, where graph shows Total Storage:31GB (and used/free is affected in same way). So it is ok when i keep "-b 1024" (seems working, data in rrd are ok, so the only problem was the graph ?) Kryglik Javier Szyszlican wrote: I've never seen the problem, but you may be right. How can you verify it? Modifying that file will only affect the storage graph, nothing else. Javier kryglik wrote: Hello list :) i've discovered a little problem with storage graphs. It seems they count using division of 1000 -- so the results are strange :-) Running on linux systems. Anybody with the same problem? I found solution by adding "-b 1024" in graphs/storage.inc.php $opts_header on the end of file. But I am not sure whether it doesn't destroy something else in a jffnms-engine :) Any suggestions/ideas? thanks. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users