Hello Javier, Here's a 'top' output :
Mem: 1035332k total, 933816k used, 101516k free, 87632k buffers Swap: 1044184k total, 5316k used, 1038868k free, 422428k cached Then a snmpwalk : UCD-SNMP-MIB::memIndex.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memErrorName.0 = STRING: swap UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalSwap.0 = INTEGER: 1044184 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailSwap.0 = INTEGER: 1038868 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalReal.0 = INTEGER: 1035332 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailReal.0 = INTEGER: 101648 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalFree.0 = INTEGER: 1140516 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memMinimumSwap.0 = INTEGER: 16000 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memShared.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memBuffer.0 = INTEGER: 87632 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memCached.0 = INTEGER: 422496 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memSwapError.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memSwapErrorMsg.0 = STRING: If i understood, we report the "UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalFree.0", is it wrong instead to use the following formula ? : UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalReal.0 - (UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailReal.0 + UCD-SNMP-MIB::memBuffer.0 + UCD-SNMP-MIB::memCached.0) If we had access to these different data, we could (using computations) calculate the value we want to use. What do you think about this ? Best regards. On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 01:49:13PM -0300, Javier Szyszlican wrote: > Thats an issue of the net-snmp people. > We just monitor their "Free" OID. > > But I know what you are saying and its true, its counting cached as used. > > Javier ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
