First of all, thank you for taking the time to help with this. I have included some extra information that you didn't request. If unnecessary, I apologize. Another quick note, we added another Cisco device configured with the same MCI interface configuration (sub interface 0/0/0.500) and are having the same issue. That interface alone will not graph even though its other interfaces do. Sorry, just realized that the second e-mail requesting the directory output wasn't sent to me! So, without further ado, here is what you asked for:
JFFNMS Platform (command output "uname -a" [Debian Sarge 3.1]): Linux xxx.xxxxxxx.net 2.4.27-2-386 #1 Wed Aug 17 09:33:35 UTC 2005 i686 GNU/Linux UpTime: 18:24:21 up 28 days, 39 min, 2 users, load average: 0.29, 0.65, 1.56 SNMP Version: 2c on a Cisco 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVSECURITYK9-M), Version 12.4(1a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Dir output from RRD directory (truncated): interface-100-0.rrd interface-103-0.rrd interface-103-10.rrd interface-103-11.rrd interface-103-1.rrd interface-103-2.rrd ... interface-99-3.rrd interface-99-4.rrd interface-99-5.rrd interface-99-6.rrd interface-99-7.rrd -----Original Message----- From: Javier Szyszlican [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:48 PM To: Craig Small Cc: Joshua Sidwell Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] Help with an interface that won't graph What SNMP version did you choose for this router? Javier Craig Small wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 03:13:03PM -0700, Joshua Sidwell wrote: > >>>22:59:01 : H 4 : I 20 : P 20 : snmp_counter:input(.1.3..6.6): -> >>>buffer(): 2 (time P: 267.67 | B: 0.1) >> >>As I suspected, the device is not returning any values for traffic. >>See the 6.6.): and then -> between those there should be a number. > > Considering the counter in your snmpwalk below shows a value and the > poller does not, I think it is one for Javier. I'm not too sure why > they are different. > > >>>22:59:03 : H 4 : I 20 : P 47 : db:bandwidthin(band..tes): 193000 >> >>-> >> >>>buffer(): 9 (time P: 0.04 | B: 0.1) > > 193000 is in bytes apparently > 8 * 193000 = 1544000 > > > >>This is what I see from SNMPWALK (notice that the ifType.6 is >>frameRelay(32), and that the speed is correctly reported with a >>counter value that is nonzero. The only zero value is for the software loopback: >>ifNumber.0 = INTEGER: 6 >>ifIndex.1 = INTEGER: 1 >>ifIndex.2 = INTEGER: 2 >>ifIndex.3 = INTEGER: 3 >>ifIndex.4 = INTEGER: 4 >>ifIndex.5 = INTEGER: 5 >>ifIndex.6 = INTEGER: 6 >>ifDescr.1 = STRING: Serial0/0/0 >>ifDescr.2 = STRING: FastEthernet0/0 >>ifDescr.3 = STRING: FastEthernet0/1 >>ifDescr.4 = STRING: Null0 >>ifDescr.5 = STRING: Loopback0 >>ifDescr.6 = STRING: Serial0/0/0.500 >>ifType.1 = INTEGER: frameRelay(32) >>ifType.2 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) >>ifType.3 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) >>ifType.4 = INTEGER: other(1) >>ifType.5 = INTEGER: softwareLoopback(24) >>ifType.6 = INTEGER: frameRelay(32) >>ifMtu.1 = INTEGER: 1500 >>ifMtu.2 = INTEGER: 1500 >>ifMtu.3 = INTEGER: 1500 >>ifMtu.4 = INTEGER: 1500 >>ifMtu.5 = INTEGER: 1514 >>ifMtu.6 = INTEGER: 1500 >>ifSpeed.1 = Gauge32: 1536000 >>ifSpeed.2 = Gauge32: 100000000 >>ifSpeed.3 = Gauge32: 100000000 >>ifSpeed.4 = Gauge32: 4294967295 >>ifSpeed.5 = Gauge32: 4294967295 >>ifSpeed.6 = Gauge32: 1536000 >>ifInOctets.1 = Counter32: 1657826637 >>ifInOctets.2 = Counter32: 2123191128 >>ifInOctets.3 = Counter32: 2103439122 >>ifInOctets.4 = Counter32: 3075347496 >>ifInOctets.5 = Counter32: 0 >>ifInOctets.6 = Counter32: 1652858698 >> > > -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Javier Szyszlican [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
