On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Miha Verlic wrote:
> I googled around a bit, and it seems there is different version (though
> labled the same) available on
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/shaggy/jfs/jfsutils-1.1.12.tar.gz.
> This one appears to work ok.

Crazy. However, both versions only differ in the build scripts:

Files jfsutils-1.1.12_kernel.org/aclocal.m4 and jfsutils-1.1.12_SF/aclocal.m4 
differ
Files jfsutils-1.1.12_kernel.org/configure and jfsutils-1.1.12_SF/configure 
differ
Files jfsutils-1.1.12_kernel.org/include/jfs_version.h and 
jfsutils-1.1.12_SF/include/jfs_version.h differ

I wonder why this made jfs.fsck to fail...

C.
-- 
BOFH excuse #104:

backup tape overwritten with copy of system manager's favourite CD

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Reply via email to