Dave Kleikamp wrote: > There have been a lot of bug fixes since then, but I wouldn't > know off the top of my head anything specific that would explain this. > >> I tried upgrading to 1.1.11, but had to back down to 1.1.7 as the new >> utils refused to do an fsck. > > What error did you get? There's no reason 1.1.11 should have failed.
I'm pretty certain it said something about the superblock, but I didn't take note. I can probably reproduce it, but is there any point? > Do you have any plans to upgrade to a newer distribution? JFS has > gotten a lot more stable in the 2.6 kernel than it was back in 2.4. Yep, I've been preparing a new system since this morning. Latest 2.6 kernel. The fsck is still running, but I've been able to copy the key files to the new system, later I hope to be able to recover as much as possible of the data. > I'm pretty impressed that it's been holding up this long under such a > high load. Well, looks like it wasn't holding up all that well ... /Per Jessen, Zürich ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
