On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 16:40 +0200, Per Jessen wrote: > Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > > There have been a lot of bug fixes since then, but I wouldn't > > know off the top of my head anything specific that would explain this. > > > >> I tried upgrading to 1.1.11, but had to back down to 1.1.7 as the new > >> utils refused to do an fsck. > > > > What error did you get? There's no reason 1.1.11 should have failed. > > I'm pretty certain it said something about the superblock, but I didn't > take note. I can probably reproduce it, but is there any point?
Not if you're moving up to a new system. I'm a bit curious though. > > Do you have any plans to upgrade to a newer distribution? JFS has > > gotten a lot more stable in the 2.6 kernel than it was back in 2.4. > > Yep, I've been preparing a new system since this morning. Latest 2.6 > kernel. > The fsck is still running, but I've been able to copy the key files to > the new system, later I hope to be able to recover as much as possible > of the data. > > > I'm pretty impressed that it's been holding up this long under such a > > high load. > > Well, looks like it wasn't holding up all that well ... I think you'll have better luck on a modern kernel. I trust you'll let me know if any new problems show up. Thanks, Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
