On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 at 11:02, Fiedler Roman wrote: > Different observations with various kernels (stock hardy/lucid, so > up to 2.6.32) made me wonder, if there are known issues with default jfs > settings, general jfs stability or fsck functionality in case of > fast/unclean jfs fs shutdown.
Well, there's https://bugzilla.kernel.org and of course the bugtracker on SF and also the mailing list archive for "known issues". > * Normal reboot after shutdown or crash, mount works without problems, redo ok > * If detected by chance, you might find files, where e.g. ls reports "stale > nfs > lock", although file is normal jfs file (e.g. /var/log/dmesg.3.gz) Is NFS involved at all? If not, there was at least another post similar to this: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01636.html > Do you have trunk jfs modules for Ubuntu lucid kernel or even a whole trunk > kernel > with trunk jfs for testing? I could offer to try to reproduce on virtual JFS is in maintenance-mode, development has stopped for a while now, so ../fs/jfs from the Ubuntu kernel should be equal to the latest vanilla one. > Jfs log extracted from system suffering problems after hard power down: This is with jfsutils-1.1.15, right? Also, do you see any errors in your syslog for the disks in question? Christian. -- BOFH excuse #30: positron router malfunction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
