> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Dave Kleikamp [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Freitag, 22. April 2011 14:47 > > On 04/22/2011 07:37 AM, Fiedler Roman wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > Has someone already tried the reproducer, also added to Launchpad bug > > report? > > Sorry. I haven't done anything with this yet. I'll try to get to it soon.
No problem. I was just curious. I had 1 more event on a lucid machine where Xorg log file entry got corrupted during normal reboot sequence, so that X startup caused jfs to become readonly. So I'm just interested, if someone else can reproduce also, or if it is just some error using the filesystem and fsck on my side. Apart from that, I started to change automatic deployment default from jfs to ext3/ext4 to get good statistical data if ext variants are really not affected that much. Roman > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jfsutils/+bug/754495 > > > > Did it work causing dataloss with just a few reboots or did it not? > > With this setup in a vbox virtual machine, jfs is much more > > vulnerable to this than ext3. > > > > Kind regards, Roman > > Shaggy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
