On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 23:56 -0800, Sang Nguyen Van wrote: > --- Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay, I've seen this before and this patch to > > jfsutils should get fsck > > past phase 1. Could you please give it a try? > > > I've just built and installed the new jfsutils with > the patches in those 3 files which you pointed out. > The results of jfs_fsck seems to puzzle me, with > jfs_fsck /dev/hdb1 and jfs_fsck -f /dev/hdb1 I have > the same message: > The current device is: /dev/hdb1 > Block size in bytes: 4096 > Filesystem size in blocks: 40019915 > **Phase 0 - Replay Journal Log > logredo failed (rc=-268). fsck continuing.
This is not good. -268 indicates that fsck did not recognize the journal's superblock. > **Phase 1 - Check Blocks, Files/Directories, and > Directory Entries > > It stopped here, without any message telling "the > system is clean" as before. Any suggestion? Hmm, this is what the patch was supposed to fix. Could you try running fsck with the -d flag (debug)? > Thanks, > Sang Nguyen Thanks, Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
