--- Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, this is what the patch was supposed to fix. > Could you try running > fsck with the -d flag (debug)?
The result is: ...:/ # jfs_fsck -d /dev/hdb1 jfs_fsck version 1.1.7, 22-Jul-2004 processing started: 12/8/2004 8.49.47 Using default parameter: -p [xchkdsk.c:3157] The current device is: /dev/hdb1 [xchkdsk.c:1558] Open(...READ/WRITE EXCLUSIVE...) returned rc = 0 [fsckpfs.c:3273] Primary superblock is valid. [fsckmeta.c:1570] The type of file system for the device is JFS. [xchkdsk.c:1575] Block size in bytes: 4096 [xchkdsk.c:1902] Filesystem size in blocks: 40019915 [xchkdsk.c:1909] **Phase 0 - Replay Journal Log [xchkdsk.c:1916] LOGREDO: Log superblock contains invalid magic number. [logredo.c:537] logredo failed (rc=-268). fsck continuing. [xchkdsk.c:1946] **Phase 1 - Check Blocks, Files/Directories, and Directory Entries [xchkdsk.c:2041] processing terminated: 12/8/2004 8:49:47 with return code: 10052 exit code: 8. [xchkdsk.c:472] About the syslog, before we installed the new SuSe 9.2, my administrator checked the system and said there was an error message like the system is trying to write to the area out of the hardisk space (?!). I have a question: the problem comes from my old SuSe 7.3 (old kernel), and so the jfs handler or something else? Eventhough there may not be much hope for recovering the partition, I just don't want it to occur again! Thanks, Sang Nguyen. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
