On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:03:03AM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 08:20 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > I also noticed that several of the static functions called by diAlloc do > > show up in this latest stack trace, so I believe I was mistaken about > > the cause of the earlier deadlock. I now think that the thread in > > diAlloc was trying to grab the AG_LOCK, and never made it down into > > diNewIAG. I'm afraid there may still be two different problems that > > still need to be figured out. > > No, I think it's the same problem. I only saw a subset of the blocked > threads in the earlier case, and I believe there probably was a thread > blocked in diNewIAG. >
Yeah, I looked through the earlier backtrace file and found a thread in diNewIAG, I'll try the patch. Sonny _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
