On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 12:30 -0600, Steven Pratt wrote: > Also, is it maybe time to increase the default number of locks? We had > similar problems on large systems in SLES9 testing and we still have to > run SPECSFS with TxLocks set to 65k.
Yeah, I've thought of this before and haven't done it. I think I'll base it on the amount of physical memory, so we don't introduce any new problems for small-memory machines. > Steve -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
