Tom,
When Language Detection is enabled in JAWS, language tags in a Word document or 
in the HTML code of a web page cause JAWS to speak the name of the language 
designated by these tags.  Somehow, Catalan language tags have been introduced 
into your documents.

Did you enter all of the information in the documents yourself, or was some of 
it copied from other sources such as the Internet?  If these tags were in 
copied material, they might have been pasted into your documents.

Keep in mind that the Catalan language tags are still in your documents even 
though you have stopped JAWS from reporting their presence.  I guess if sighted 
readers of the documents haven't said anything about the headings looking 
strange though, the presence of the tags don't really matter.

Gary King
[email protected]
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tom Behler 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:25 PM
  Subject: Re: Catalyn Problem Solved


  Brian:

   

  The documents in question were copies of some of my course syllabi and 
initial class handout materials.  And, trust me, no part of them was in 
Spanish!!  (smile)

   

  What might have triggered the Catalan designation by Jaws is still a mystery 
to me, although I do wonder if it had something to do with a particular font 
style or something similar.

   

  The catalan designation was spoken for various headings throughout the 
documents, and went away when I unchecked the language detect change option in 
MS Word.

   

  I’m using Windows 7, Office 2010, and Jaws 16 here.

   

  Dr.  Tom Behler

   

   

   

   

  From: Brian Vogel [mailto:[email protected]] 
  Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 1:22 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Catalyn Problem Solved

   

  Tom, just for my curiosity, do you have any idea what JAWS was detecting that 
it thought was in the Catalan dialect of Spanish?   This seems really odd since 
my presumption is that the documents in question are not in any form of Spanish 
(and on that I could be entirely wrong).

  Brian



Reply via email to