I hear you, Angel. Only, I often have to work with the printed page for 
submission to sighted people, not just read it for my own benefit or pleasure. 
There's a big difference between the twain when you must present a job that is 
expected to be true to the original layout as opposed to just being well 
translated, or, as I was mentioning in another thread, offer and present 
material to a student and refer to precise exercises and examples, or page 
numbers.

As a reader, I agree wholeheartedly that technology has brought us tremendously 
increased access to useful and entertaining material. The working arena, with 
its increased dependence on the graphics user interface, plus the ease with 
which sighted computer users can assemble publishable material, , puts us at a 
greater, and bleaker, disadvantage. I can't tell you how many translation job 
offers I've had to reject, simply because I cannot guarantee exact rendition of 
formats, or ensure that the panes of a certain brochure will follow in the 
correct order or be associated with the right picture. The information 
blackout, as Brian Vogel calls it (I think), is the ever-present ghost, or 
monster, ready to bite you in the toes, preferably at midnight when you're 
struggling to meet a deadline. Maybe I should switch from translation to horror 
fiction writing...

Cheers,


Gudrun


-----Original Message-----
From: Angel [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 12:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: textbook scanning for teaching purposes

You wouldn't say that if technology caused you to be able to read a printed 
page.  When without technology you couldn't.

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Brian Vogel <mailto:[email protected]>
        To: [email protected] 
        Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 11:06 PM
        Subject: Re: textbook scanning for teaching purposes


        Gudrun,

                 Not that I necessarily think the result will be better, but if 
you can share the file with me I'll take a look at it.  Actually, 20 minutes 
for 704 pages seems remarkably fast, it's taken me much longer than that to do 
shorter files, but a lot of that depends on the original file itself.

                 The only thing worse than technology is the lack of 
technology, and sometimes the degree of worse is very, very little!!

        Brian




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
[email protected]
Archives located at: http://www.groups.io/g/jfw/threads
Alternative archives located at: 
http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html

If you have any concerns about the list, posts received from the list, or the 
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the 
list owner at [email protected].
-=-=-
Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View This Message (#38300): https://groups.io/g/jfw/message/38300
Mute This Thread: https://groups.io/mt/598030?uid=21656

Change Your Subscription: https://groups.io/g/jfw/editsub?uid=21656
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/jfw/leave/46502/1292106160/xyzzy

Group Home: https://groups.io/g/jfw
Contact Group Owner: [email protected]
Terms of Service: https://groups.io/static/tos
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to