>>> I’ve put out another webrev, >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sdrach/8156499/webrev.05/, that addresses >>> Mandy’s concerns. In particular I demonstrate that the resultant image is >>> “runnable” and that a Main class in the image can/cannot find the >>> java.logging module when the module-info.class is changed to require >>> java.logging in one case but not in the other. >> >> Looks okay in general. The jlink change looks correct. Thanks for updating >> the test. > > In fact - does this test run on windows? > > 239 Path java = Paths.get(image, "bin", "java”); > > On windows, shouldn’t this need to be “java.exe”?
It turns out it runs just fine on the jprt windows test.
