On 11/12/2016 13:05, Remi Forax wrote:

Hi Alan,
if i get it right, the jdk9 b148 (not the jigsaw version) get a refresh of 
module-info classfile format but did not get the last two changes,
version of requires and the two new constant pool entries.
Do you plan to push these changes in the jdk9 workspace soon so i will delay 
the release of ASM 6 alpha 2 or do you plan to introduce these changes later so 
i should release an alpha 2 now and release an alpha 3/beta later ?


That's right. We are going to aim for jdk-9+150 to get the latest proposals integrated.

-Alan

Reply via email to