As far as i know, no pending changes ! and given how close we are from the end (the spec is in EDR stage), i hope that the classfile format is in its final version.
cheers, Rémi > De: "Roman Shevchenko" <[email protected]> > À: "Alan Bateman" <[email protected]>, "Remi Forax" <[email protected]> > Cc: "jigsaw-dev" <[email protected]> > Envoyé: Lundi 30 Janvier 2017 10:16:23 > Objet: Re: Sync with jdk9 and ASM alpha 2 > Hi, > are there any pending changes to the class file format? Looking forward to the > Alpha 2 release :) >> On 11 Dec 2016, at 17:21, Alan Bateman < [email protected] > wrote: >> On 11/12/2016 13:05, Remi Forax wrote: >>> Hi Alan, >>> if i get it right, the jdk9 b148 (not the jigsaw version) get a refresh of >>> module-info classfile format but did not get the last two changes, >>> version of requires and the two new constant pool entries. >>> Do you plan to push these changes in the jdk9 workspace soon so i will >>> delay the >>> release of ASM 6 alpha 2 or do you plan to introduce these changes later so >>> i >>> should release an alpha 2 now and release an alpha 3/beta later ? >> That's right. We are going to aim for jdk-9+150 to get the latest proposals >> integrated. >> -Alan
