On 01/02/2017 21:49, Nicolai Parlog wrote:
Hi Alan,
`-Xdiag:resolver` is awesome! :) I think these messages are great
candidates for info-level messages with the "modules" tag via unified
logging.
I agree it should be transparent to developers using the JDK as to
whether the implementation is in libjvm or else where, something that
will likely more of an issue going forward when more of the run time is
written in the Java Language.
Something else I noticed, neither Xlog nor Xdiag help with problematic
configurations - both only start logging after everything checked out,
so with missing modules (for example), they do not provide additional
information.
The trace messages emitted by -Xdiag:resolver are printed as the
resolver runs. So aside from the initial module then they would see some
output when transitive dependences can't be found.
-Alan
