On 05/19/2017 11:48 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: > Hi Mark, > > thanks for this proposal. I think it is pragmatic and well balanced. > > While I personally agree with the advocates of a clean solution I also > understand the the needs of big (and slow) companies (including the > one I'm working for:) After all, the new default isn't that bad in my > opinion because it only affects applications/libraries on the class > path which is legacy anyway. If you convert your application/libraries > to modules it will still benefit from the full JPMS features and > restrictions. So altogether I think it is a good compromise.
I agree with Volker. Thanks Reto
