On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 15:36 -0800, Mandy Chung wrote: > On 2/13/19 1:04 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > > --strip-native-debug-symbols no-keep-debuginfo > > --strip-native-debug-symbols strip-debuginfo > > --strip-native-debug-symbols remove-debuginfo > > > > It would avoid using negation. > > What about 'omit', i.e. > > --strip-native-debug-symbols omit-debuginfo > --strip-native-debug-symbols keep-debuginfo=<ext>
I like it. Good for me. > > Sure. I've filed JDK-8218913 for doing this first. Would a name of -- > > strip-java-debug-symbols be acceptable? My thinking is that it would > > have nice symmetry with --strip-native-debug-symbols. Thoughts? > > --strip-native-debug-symbols is okay. > > Having a second thought, javac -g and gcc -g both say "debugging > information". I think we could go with: > > --strip-java-debug-info > --strip-native-debug-info omit-debuginfo > --strip-native-debug-info keep-debuginfo=<ext> > > unless anyone thinks `-debug-symbols` is better? > > The options are getting pretty good now. +1. debug-info over debug-symbols is good for me. Thanks, Severin
