Sorry, I could have been a bit more specific. I meant something like Method.setAccessible(Lookup, true)
I want to base an API on lookup objects. But I want to still support some use cases where people rely on java.lang.reflect.Field|Constructor|Method. Specifically, being able to create an Executable that can be instantiated/invoked. So I'm looking for a way to make members (Field|Constructor|Method) accessible in some way using a Lookup object. Obviously, this would not be a problem if my API relied on open packages/modules via module-info.java and member.setAccessible(true) instead of using Lookup objects. /Kasper On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 12:11, Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote: > > see > https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/13/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandles.html#privateLookupIn(java.lang.Class,java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.Lookup) > > Rémi > > ----- Mail original ----- > > De: "Kasper Nielsen" <kaspe...@gmail.com> > > À: "jigsaw-dev" <jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net> > > Envoyé: Mercredi 8 Janvier 2020 12:14:30 > > Objet: Lookup objects and setAccessible > > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to bridge some old code using java.lang.reflect and some new code > > that uses Lookup objects. And I'm wondering if there is some way to make > > a member accessible using a Lookup object? Or if open packages/modules via > > module-info.java + member.setAccessible(true) is the only way? > > > > Thanks > > Kasper
