Have you looked at Lookup::revealDirect and MethodHandleInfo::reflectAs?
Mandy
On 1/8/20 5:49 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
Sorry, I could have been a bit more specific. I meant something like
Method.setAccessible(Lookup, true)
I want to base an API on lookup objects. But I want to still support some use
cases where people rely on java.lang.reflect.Field|Constructor|Method.
Specifically, being able to create an Executable that can be
instantiated/invoked. So I'm looking for a way to make members
(Field|Constructor|Method) accessible in some way using a Lookup object.
Obviously, this would not be a problem if my API relied on open
packages/modules via module-info.java and member.setAccessible(true)
instead of using Lookup objects.
/Kasper
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 12:11, Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
see
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/13/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandles.html#privateLookupIn(java.lang.Class,java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.Lookup)
Rémi
----- Mail original -----
De: "Kasper Nielsen" <kaspe...@gmail.com>
À: "jigsaw-dev" <jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Envoyé: Mercredi 8 Janvier 2020 12:14:30
Objet: Lookup objects and setAccessible
Hi,
I'm trying to bridge some old code using java.lang.reflect and some new code
that uses Lookup objects. And I'm wondering if there is some way to make
a member accessible using a Lookup object? Or if open packages/modules via
module-info.java + member.setAccessible(true) is the only way?
Thanks
Kasper
