[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-13449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17584153#comment-17584153
 ] 

Kun Liu commented on ARROW-13449:
---------------------------------

hi [~lidavidm] , it's flexible but not very clear using the bytes to represent 
the schema.

For example, some user meet the issue, the arrow-rs implementation the 
`SchameResult` with raw flatbuffer.

Details in the issue:

[https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/2445]

[https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/13853]

 

By the way, the version of `flight.proto` in arrow-rs is out of date, I will 
file a pr to update the `flight.proto` in the rust version. 

> [Format][FlightRPC] Clarify that schemas are IPC-encapsulated
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-13449
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-13449
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: FlightRPC, Format
>            Reporter: David Li
>            Assignee: Nate Bauernfeind
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 7.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> FlightRPC.proto is ambiguous about whether schemas are meant to be the raw 
> Flatbuffer or IPC-encapsulated, but all implementations choose the latter and 
> it was intended to be encapsulated. We should update the comments.
> See ML discussion: 
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd3538bb70753661b33fb37ebde895bbf6859d044e5cc4c4f4353534c%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to