clolov commented on code in PR #12492:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12492#discussion_r946760595


##########
streams/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/internals/KStreamFlatTransformValuesTest.java:
##########
@@ -68,69 +72,60 @@ public void 
shouldTransformInputRecordToMultipleOutputValues() {
                 "Hello",
                 "Blue",
                 "Planet");
+
         processor.init(context);
-        EasyMock.reset(valueTransformer);
 
-        EasyMock.expect(valueTransformer.transform(inputKey, 
inputValue)).andReturn(outputValues);
-        for (final String outputValue : outputValues) {
-            context.forward(new Record<>(inputKey, outputValue, 0L));
-        }
-        replayAll();
+        when(valueTransformer.transform(inputKey, 
inputValue)).thenReturn(outputValues);
 
         processor.process(new Record<>(inputKey, inputValue, 0L));
 
-        verifyAll();
+        for (final String outputValue : outputValues) {
+            verify(context).forward(new Record<>(inputKey, outputValue, 0L));
+        }
     }
 
     @Test
     public void shouldEmitNoRecordIfTransformReturnsEmptyList() {
         processor.init(context);
-        EasyMock.reset(valueTransformer);
 
-        EasyMock.expect(valueTransformer.transform(inputKey, 
inputValue)).andReturn(Collections.emptyList());
-        replayAll();
+        when(valueTransformer.transform(inputKey, 
inputValue)).thenReturn(Collections.emptyList());
 
         processor.process(new Record<>(inputKey, inputValue, 0L));
 
-        verifyAll();
+        verify(context, never()).forward(ArgumentMatchers.<Record<Integer, 
String>>any());
     }
 
     @Test
     public void shouldEmitNoRecordIfTransformReturnsNull() {
         processor.init(context);
-        EasyMock.reset(valueTransformer);
 
-        EasyMock.expect(valueTransformer.transform(inputKey, 
inputValue)).andReturn(null);
-        replayAll();
+        when(valueTransformer.transform(inputKey, 
inputValue)).thenReturn(null);
 
         processor.process(new Record<>(inputKey, inputValue, 0L));
 
-        verifyAll();
+        verify(context, never()).forward(ArgumentMatchers.<Record<Integer, 
String>>any());
     }
 
     @Test
     public void shouldCloseFlatTransformValuesProcessor() {
-        valueTransformer.close();
-        replayAll();
-
         processor.close();
 
-        verifyAll();
+        verify(valueTransformer).close();
     }
 
     @Test
     public void shouldGetFlatTransformValuesProcessor() {
+        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
         final ValueTransformerWithKeySupplier<Integer, Integer, 
Iterable<String>> valueTransformerSupplier =
             mock(ValueTransformerWithKeySupplier.class);
         final KStreamFlatTransformValues<Integer, Integer, String> 
processorSupplier =
             new KStreamFlatTransformValues<>(valueTransformerSupplier);
 
-        
EasyMock.expect(valueTransformerSupplier.get()).andReturn(valueTransformer);
-        replayAll();
+        when(valueTransformerSupplier.get()).thenReturn(valueTransformer);
 
         final Processor<Integer, Integer, Integer, String> processor = 
processorSupplier.get();
 
-        verifyAll();
+        verify(valueTransformerSupplier).get();

Review Comment:
   @cadonna I went into the source code of Mockito and came across the following
   ```
   // only report when:
   // 1. if all tests from given test have ran (filter requested is false)
   //   Otherwise we would report unnecessary stubs even if the user runs just 
single test
   // from the class
   // 2. tests are successful (we don't want to add an extra failure on top of 
any existing
   // failure, to avoid confusion)
   ```
   Indeed, if you run the test class rather than just the test you do get the 
report. Why it does this, however, I do not know.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to