nicktelford commented on code in PR #13993:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13993#discussion_r1261077502


##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/ConsumerCoordinator.java:
##########
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ public final class ConsumerCoordinator extends 
AbstractCoordinator {
     private Set<String> joinedSubscription;
     private MetadataSnapshot metadataSnapshot;
     private MetadataSnapshot assignmentSnapshot;
+    private boolean metadataUpdated;

Review Comment:
   On reflection, I'm not convinced that this strategy will work, because 
there's already a shortcut on the `version` check, which means that the 
performance I'm seeing is when `assignmentSnapshot.version != 
metadataSnapshot.version`, so we definitely need to do the deep-equality check 
to determine if the new version of the metadata is actually different from the 
previous version.
   
   I'm looking into some alternatives around whether we can represent this 
internal metadata differently, in a way that's more efficient to compare.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to