lianetm commented on code in PR #16899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/16899#discussion_r1743565460
##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/ConsumerConfig.java:
##########
@@ -727,6 +731,20 @@ private void checkGroupRemoteAssignor() {
}
}
+ @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
+ private void checkPartitionAssigmentStrategy() {
+ List<Object> assignmentStrategies = (List<Object>)
get(PARTITION_ASSIGNMENT_STRATEGY_CONFIG);
+ if
(getString(GROUP_PROTOCOL_CONFIG).equalsIgnoreCase(GroupProtocol.CONSUMER.name()))
{
Review Comment:
I wonder if it would help readability to encapsulate this in something along
the lines of:
```suggestion
if (isConsumerProtocol()) {
```
And then a similar `isClassicProtocol()`. The trick is that we already have
protocol checks in 2 places (this and `checkGroupRemoteAssignor`), and I expect
we will need it again as we keep adding other consistency validations.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
