m1a2st commented on code in PR #23014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/23014#discussion_r3809283539


##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/AsyncKafkaConsumer.java:
##########
@@ -1985,29 +1985,27 @@ private Fetch<K, V> pollForFetches(Timer timer) {
             return fetch;
         }
 
-        long pollTimeout = isCommittedOffsetsManagementEnabled()
-                ? Math.min(applicationEventHandler.maximumTimeToWait(), 
timer.remainingMs())
-                : timer.remainingMs();
-        // With the non-blocking poll design, it's possible that at this point 
the background thread is
-        // concurrently working to update positions. Therefore, a _copy_ of 
the current assignment is retrieved
-        // and iterated looking for any partitions with invalid positions. 
This is done to avoid being stuck
-        // in poll for an unnecessarily long amount of time if we are missing 
some positions since the offset
-        // lookup may be backing off after a failure.
-        if (pollTimeout > retryBackoffMs) {
-            Set<TopicPartition> partitions = 
subscriptions.assignedPartitions();
+        long pollTimeout = 
Math.min(applicationEventHandler.maximumTimeToWait(), timer.remainingMs());
 
-            if (partitions.isEmpty()) {
-                // If there aren't any assigned partitions, this could mean 
that this consumer's group membership
-                // has not been established or assignments have been removed 
and not yet reassigned. In either case,
-                // reduce the poll time for the fetch buffer wait.
+        // Bound the wait when background progress may make fetching possible 
soon.
+        // Use the current application-thread state to avoid relying on stale 
state from the network thread.
+        if (pollTimeout > retryBackoffMs) {
+            if (subscriptions.numAssignedPartitions() == 0) {
+                // If there are no assigned partitions, reduce the fetch 
buffer wait time. This may happen when
+                // group membership has not been established yet, assignments 
have been revoked but not reassigned,
+                // bootstrap DNS resolution is still in progress, or manual 
assignment has not happened yet.
+                pollTimeout = retryBackoffMs;
+            } else if (!subscriptions.hasAllFetchPositions()) {
+                // If some partitions do not have valid positions, the 
background thread may still be resolving them,
+                // for example by fetching committed offsets, looking up 
offsets by timestamp, or backing off after a
+                // failure. Reduce the wait time so the application thread can 
consume data promptly once positions are
+                // resolved.
+                pollTimeout = retryBackoffMs;
+            } else if (subscriptions.hasFetchablePartitions(tp -> 
!fetchBuffer.bufferedPartitions().contains(tp))) {

Review Comment:
   I’ve moved this check back to `FetchRequestManager.maximumTimeToWait()`, 
where it can avoid applying the bound when in-flight requests already guarantee 
a wakeup.
   
   The application thread now only bounds the timeout for conditions it can 
observe from fresh state: no assigned partitions, or positions that have not 
been resolved yet.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to