chickenchickenlove commented on code in PR #23978:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/23978#discussion_r4401119966
##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/StreamsGroupTopologyDescriptionRequestManager.java:
##########
@@ -165,6 +165,14 @@ private void onResponse(final ClientResponse response,
final Throwable exception
streamsRebalanceData.setTopologyPushRequired(false);
break;
+ case STREAMS_INVALID_TOPOLOGY_EPOCH:
Review Comment:
nit;
Would it be better to explicitly include `STREAMS_INVALID_TOPOLOGY_EPOCH`
here, as we do with other cases, even though it would be handled by the default
branch anyway? For example, similar to case
`STREAMS_TOPOLOGY_DESCRIPTION_UPDATE_FAILED:` (L176)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
