feyman2016 commented on a change in pull request #8589:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8589#discussion_r431352788



##########
File path: 
streams/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/integration/AbstractResetIntegrationTest.java
##########
@@ -261,6 +261,42 @@ public void 
shouldNotAllowToResetWhenIntermediateTopicAbsent() throws Exception
         Assert.assertEquals(1, exitCode);
     }
 
+    public void testResetWhenLongSessionTimeoutConfiguredWithForceOption() 
throws Exception {
+        appID = testId + "-with-force-option";
+        streamsConfig.put(StreamsConfig.APPLICATION_ID_CONFIG, appID);
+        streamsConfig.put(ConsumerConfig.SESSION_TIMEOUT_MS_CONFIG, "" + 
STREAMS_CONSUMER_TIMEOUT * 100);
+
+        // Run
+        streams = new 
KafkaStreams(setupTopologyWithoutIntermediateUserTopic(), streamsConfig);
+        streams.start();
+        final List<KeyValue<Long, Long>> result = 
IntegrationTestUtils.waitUntilMinKeyValueRecordsReceived(resultConsumerConfig, 
OUTPUT_TOPIC, 10);
+
+        streams.close();
+
+        // RESET
+        streams = new 
KafkaStreams(setupTopologyWithoutIntermediateUserTopic(), streamsConfig);
+        streams.cleanUp();
+
+        // Reset would fail since long session timeout has been configured
+        final boolean cleanResult = tryCleanGlobal(false, null, null);
+        Assert.assertEquals(false, cleanResult);
+
+        // Reset will success with --force, it will force delete active 
members on broker side
+        cleanGlobal(false, "--force", null);
+
+        waitForEmptyConsumerGroup(adminClient, appID, TIMEOUT_MULTIPLIER * 
CLEANUP_CONSUMER_TIMEOUT);
+
+        assertInternalTopicsGotDeleted(null);
+
+        // RE-RUN

Review comment:
       Yeah, I totally agree with: `It seems best to keep test to a "minimum".`
   Not sure if my understanding is correct, but I still think the tests for 
`resetter` should compare the first run and re-run results, from the test's 
perspective, it cannot assume that `--force` option won't do something 
underneath that make the re-run produce different results. 
   But I'm ok to remove the RE-RUN part if we do think it's redundant.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to