ableegoldman commented on a change in pull request #10683:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10683#discussion_r679589984



##########
File path: 
streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/processor/internals/TopologyMetadata.java
##########
@@ -16,10 +16,304 @@
  */
 package org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.internals;
 
+import org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.OffsetResetStrategy;
+import org.apache.kafka.common.TopicPartition;
+import org.apache.kafka.streams.StreamsConfig;
+import org.apache.kafka.streams.errors.TopologyException;
+import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.StateStore;
+import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.TaskId;
+import 
org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.internals.InternalTopologyBuilder.TopicsInfo;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.HashSet;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
 import java.util.Objects;
+import java.util.Set;
+import java.util.SortedMap;
+import java.util.TreeMap;
+import java.util.function.Consumer;
+import java.util.function.Function;
+import java.util.regex.Pattern;
+
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
+
+// TODO KAFKA-12648:
+//  1) synchronize on these methods instead of individual 
InternalTopologyBuilder methods, where applicable
 
 public class TopologyMetadata {
-    //TODO KAFKA-12648: the TopologyMetadata class is filled in by Pt. 2 (PR 
#10683)
+    private final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(TopologyMetadata.class);
+
+    // the "__" (double underscore) string is not allowed for topology names, 
so it's safe to use to indicate
+    // that it's not a named topology
+    private static final String UNNAMED_TOPOLOGY = "__UNNAMED_TOPOLOGY__";
+    private static final Pattern EMPTY_ZERO_LENGTH_PATTERN = 
Pattern.compile("");
+
+    private final StreamsConfig config;
+    private final SortedMap<String, InternalTopologyBuilder> builders; // Keep 
sorted by topology name for readability

Review comment:
       Yeah I think it would fine (better even) to swap in the topologies 
rather than the topology builders, the only reason for using the builders now 
is that a huge amount of topology-related functionality currently resides in 
the InternalTopologyBuilder, including pretty much all the metadata. I 100% 
would support cleaning this up and separating things out from this class and 
made sure it would be easy to do so here, the builders are really only kept 
around after the topology is built because they still contain most of the 
metadata we need




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to