dajac commented on a change in pull request #11688: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11688#discussion_r803835704
########## File path: clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/AbstractCoordinator.java ########## @@ -699,11 +702,15 @@ public void handle(JoinGroupResponse joinResponse, RequestFuture<ByteBuffer> fut return sendSyncGroupRequest(requestBuilder); } - private RequestFuture<ByteBuffer> onJoinLeader(JoinGroupResponse joinResponse) { + private RequestFuture<ByteBuffer> onLeaderElected(JoinGroupResponse joinResponse) { try { // perform the leader synchronization and send back the assignment for the group - Map<String, ByteBuffer> groupAssignment = performAssignment(joinResponse.data().leader(), joinResponse.data().protocolName(), - joinResponse.data().members()); + Map<String, ByteBuffer> groupAssignment = onLeaderElected( + joinResponse.data().leader(), + joinResponse.data().protocolName(), + joinResponse.data().members(), + joinResponse.data().skipAssignment() + ); Review comment: Given that we already have unit tests verifying this for the two implementations, the extra validation seems unnecessary to me. I can do it though if you believe that there is value in it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org